I’m in the people business and so probably are you
because retail is very much people oriented. It’s therefore amazing how many
businesses in this industry (and that of the leisure sector) have a total
disconnect between the people at the top of organisations and the rest of the
employees.
Disconnected: a common complaint in many companies.
Part of my role is to undertake surveys of employees,
which is always enlightening to say the least, because it highlights just how often
there is a serious disconnection between those running the show and the rest of
the team.
This is not a problem at the strongest-led companies, and
within such organisations are some of the most satisfied people. At the crux,
it involves having clarity of vision and a strategy that is clearly
communicated throughout the business.
The obvious example is Apple where the most amazing
people work on the shop floor. You almost get the impression that they would
work there without being paid such is their enthusiasm for the products. But
this is only channelled into great service by the strong management vision.
Another great operation is the Lancaster Hotel in London
where the general manager is running a £45 million business, which can seem like
he is in charge of a whole town. His stance with his team is that ‘it’s your
business, not mine, so you run it as you see fit’. He’ll help and guide them
and those who fly, fly while those who don’t will likely get booted out.
It’s harsh in some ways but it works - especially
compared with the alternative of taking the head in the sand approach and not
wanting to listen to anything your employees say. It effectively means operating
a closed-door-closed-mind policy that contributes to stifling vibrant
individuals.
A recent survey I’ve been working on highlighted how one
company’s top managers have the view that ‘this is my company and I’ll run it
how I like’. Such is the disconnection caused by this approach that its employees
put their future career prospects entirely down to luck. They reckon it depends
entirely on who are their direct managers rather than their actual abilities.
Innocent but not naive about managing people.
This is very dangerous because valuable people want to be
led in a clear and vibrant way. I’d say Innocent Drinks is another good example
of how to successfully manage people. Its strategy is to be the best fruit
smoothie producer and against this backdrop the management say: ‘How you run
your life in the business is your choice. Go and do it and keep in touch’. Sometimes they’ll stop by and ask what
employees are doing? And ask if they can help them in any way.
In contrast, pub business Mitchells & Butlers has a bad
case of disconnection as its senior level people have been all over the place –
with boardroom coups and arguments – that has led to a dearth of clear
direction given to the employees. But despite this the people on the front-line
have been delivering the goods.
The big question, therefore, is how long can this disconnected
situation last and just how successful could M&B be with proper connections
(and clear communications) between its management and employees. What exactly could
this business be with a strong chief executive who can communicate a strategy
coherently?
The retail sector undoubtedly has one of the best
communicators and advocates of connectedness - Sainsbury’s chief executive
Justin King. Consider that at the top of the company’s balanced scorecard,
which it uses for its employee assessments, is ‘Colleague Engagement’.
If you don’t achieve a certain percentage against this
metric then effectively your appraisal finishes and you go back into training.
The company’s view is that you’ve got to engage with your people.
Without having a strong connection with your employees then
I question just how well you can be connected to your customers? I suspect we all
know the answer to this one.
Sponsored column by Nigel Sapsed, director of executive search specialist Sapsed Stevens



No comments:
Post a Comment